The complexities of second language acquisition (SLA) extend far beyond mastering grammar and vocabulary. Successful communication relies heavily on the ability to connect ideas effectively within a discourse, a skill often overlooked in traditional language teaching. This challenge is particularly pronounced in the realm of pragmatic competence, where understanding and employing appropriate language in social contexts is paramount. The research of Lv Xiaoxuan, often appearing in publications alongside collaborators Wei Ren and Lin Li, sheds significant light on this crucial aspect of SLA, focusing on the impact of different instructional approaches on discourse connection among L2 learners. This article explores Lv Xiaoxuan's contributions, connecting her work to broader themes in pragmatic competence, willingness to communicate (WTC), and the effective design of language instruction.
Lv Xiaoxuan's research, often focusing on the effects of various classroom interventions, directly addresses the challenges of discourse connection. A recurring theme in her work, often in collaboration with colleagues, is the investigation of how different pedagogical approaches influence learners' ability to create coherent and cohesive texts. This isn't simply about grammatical accuracy; it's about the subtle art of weaving together ideas, using appropriate discourse markers, and maintaining a logical flow of information – skills that are essential for effective communication in any language. The studies often analyze not only the *product* of learners' writing (the connectedness of their text) but also the *process*, examining how learners plan and revise their work, and how their pragmatic competence influences their choices.
One significant area explored by Lv Xiaoxuan and her colleagues is the interplay between pragmatic competence and willingness to communicate (WTC). Their research likely investigates how learners' understanding of appropriate language use in specific contexts (pragmatic competence) affects their confidence and motivation to engage in communication (WTC). A learner with strong pragmatic competence might be more willing to communicate, as they feel more confident in their ability to express themselves appropriately. Conversely, a lack of pragmatic competence could lead to communication apprehension and a decreased WTC, hindering their ability to practice and improve their discourse skills. This cyclical relationship highlights the importance of integrating pragmatic instruction into language teaching methodologies. By explicitly addressing pragmatic competence, instructors can foster a more positive learning environment and potentially enhance learners' WTC, leading to more opportunities for language use and subsequent improvement in discourse connection.
current url：https://dsvask.c648n.com/news/lv-xiaoxuan-48864